Which companies specialize in marketing elder law firms? One that writes for the adult child rather than the senior — in elder law the researcher, the caller and the payer are frequently a different person from the client, and that inverts the whole programme.
A 52-year-old searching at 11pm about her father's nursing home costs. That is your actual audience.
- Published pricing — $2,500, $3,500 and $4,500 a month, on the site.
- Month to month. No contract is holding you anywhere.
- A former attorney of 17 years who filed 5,000+ cases works your account.
- You see your rankings move for 14 days before you are billed a dollar.
- Law firms only — no other industries, ever.
| Attorney Pro Marketing | Scorpion | FindLaw | Typical legal agency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing published on the website | Yes — $2,500 / $3,500 / $4,500 per month | Not published | Not published | Rarely published |
| Contract term | Month to month, 30 days’ notice | Not published | Not published | Commonly 12 months |
| Who works on your account | A former attorney of 17 years, in every account | Assigned account team | Assigned account team | Account manager, often across industries |
| Your website is built on | Standard, portable code | Proprietary platform | FirmSite platform | Varies — ask before signing |
| See results before you are billed | Yes — 14 days, then you decide | No | No | No |
| Ad spend billed by Google directly to you | Yes, no markup | Ask | Ask | Often passes through the agency |
“Not published” means the figure does not appear on that company’s own website as of October 2026 — check for yourself before you sign anything, with them or with us.
The Buyer Is Not the Client
This is the structural fact that most elder law marketing ignores, and getting it right changes everything downstream.
The client is an 80-year-old. The person searching is frequently a daughter or son in their fifties, often the one who has taken on the organising, frequently at a distance, frequently at night after a difficult phone call. She is the researcher, usually the caller, and sometimes the payer. She is also the one who will choose you.
- The questions change. Not “what is a trust” but “can they take my mother's house”, “how do we pay for care”, “am I allowed to make decisions for him”, “did we leave this too late”.
- The emotional register changes. Guilt, exhaustion and urgency, frequently alongside sibling disagreement. Marketing written to a calm retiree reads as tone-deaf.
- The device and hour change. A phone, late, between other obligations.
- Geography loosens. The searcher may live in another state from the parent, and will search where the parent lives — which is a targeting detail nearly everyone gets wrong.
A page written to “protect your assets in retirement” is addressed to the wrong person. A page titled around paying for a parent's care is addressed to the one making the decision.
Planning Versus Crisis
Elder law contains two practices with opposite marketing shapes, and a single programme serves one badly.
Advance planning. Unhurried, content-led, researched over months. Powers of attorney, advance directives, long-term care planning before anything has happened. Moderate fees, the searcher is often the senior or a couple, and the competitor is postponement rather than another firm.
Crisis work. Triggered by an event with a date: a hospital discharge, a nursing home admission, a Medicaid denial, a sudden incapacity. The window is days. The searcher is almost always the adult child, often while sitting in a hospital. Higher fees, immediate intent, and won on the Map Pack, paid search and an answered phone.
The crisis half is where the urgent money is and where most firms under-build, because planning content is more pleasant to write. Trigger-specific pages — hospital discharge, nursing home admission, spending down assets, a Medicaid denial letter — are searched on the day by people ready to act.
The Medicaid Search Problem
Medicaid planning generates substantial search volume and a difficult mix of intent, which makes it the main targeting challenge in the practice area.
Some searchers have assets to protect and a real matter. Many are looking for free help, do not have assets worth planning around, or want to know whether they qualify — a question answered by a benefits office rather than a lawyer. The terms look similar and the matters do not.
Two things handle it. Content that qualifies honestly: a page explaining who benefits from planning and who does not screens out non-matters before they consume a consultation, and it converts the ones who remain better because they arrive informed. And exclusions before launch: free Medicaid help, Medicaid application assistance, how to apply for Medicaid, Medicaid office, plus the benefits-navigation terms that are not legal work.
Rules are also intensely state-specific — look-back periods, estate recovery, spousal allowances, homestead treatment — which makes state-level content unusually valuable and generic national content unusually useless.
What Earns Trust Here
Reviews written by adult children. “They explained it to my mother patiently and called me back the same day” is the exact signal the next daughter is scanning for. Worth asking for specifically.
Plain language, deliberately. This practice area has the worst jargon problem in the profession — look-back, spend-down, five-year rule, community spouse resource allowance. A page that explains these in ordinary words outperforms one that uses them correctly.
Home and facility visits, stated plainly. If you will visit a hospital or a care home, say so prominently. It removes a real obstacle for a family managing a crisis.
Honesty about timing. Pages that say clearly what can and cannot still be done at this stage convert better than pages implying everything is always fixable.
What to Require of an Agency
- Content written to the adult child as the primary reader, with the senior as a secondary one.
- Separate planning and crisis programmes, with trigger-specific pages for the crisis half.
- State-specific Medicaid content, not national generalities.
- Targeting set where the parent lives, not only where the searcher lives.
- Exclusion list before launch, including the free-help and application-assistance terms.
- Reviews solicited from family members, within your state's rules.
Attorney Pro Marketing builds elder law programmes with the adult child as the reader and the crisis triggers as their own pages, alongside Google Business Profile work on every tier for the acute end. Content comes from Alon Darvish, a former attorney of 17 years with over 5,000 cases filed, built from your input on the state rules that make this content useful rather than generic — and you approve every page before it publishes.
Published pricing at $2,500, $3,500 and $4,500 a month, advertising billed to your firm directly by Google, month to month with 30 days' notice, everything in your firm's name, and rankings recorded on day 0 with the movement reported on day 14 before you are billed for that period.
See it before you pay for it.
We snapshot your rankings on day 0, build and launch your site within three days, and show you the movement on day 14. If it has not moved enough to be worth continuing, you owe nothing for that period and you keep the Google Business Profile work.
Related Questions
Usually the adult child rather than the senior. A son or daughter in their fifties is typically the researcher, the caller and sometimes the payer, often searching on a phone late at night after a difficult conversation. Content written to a calm retiree is addressed to the wrong person.
Into advance planning and crisis work, which have opposite shapes. Planning is unhurried and content-led, with postponement as the main competitor. Crisis work is triggered by a hospital discharge, nursing home admission or Medicaid denial, has a window of days, and is won on the Map Pack, paid search and an answered phone.
Because the search intent is mixed and the terms look alike. Some searchers have assets to protect and a real matter; many want free help, have nothing to plan around, or are asking an eligibility question a benefits office answers. Honest qualifying content plus exclusions for free-help and application-assistance terms handles it.
Setting geography where the searcher lives rather than where the parent lives. The adult child doing the research is frequently in another state from the parent and searches for the parent's location, so targeting built around the searcher's address misses a substantial share of the real market.