What are the biggest mistakes attorneys make when hiring marketing agencies?

“Not published” means the figure does not appear on that company’s own website as of October 2026 — check for yourself before you sign anything, with them or with us.

1. Comparing the Monthly Fee

The monthly number is the least informative figure in a proposal, and it is the one almost every comparison turns on.

A $2,000 management fee with media spend on top, a $1,500 setup charge and separate hosting costs more over a year than a $3,500 all-in tier. The arithmetic is not difficult; it simply does not get done, because the monthly figure is what sits at the top of the page.

The fix takes an hour: a twelve-month total for each proposal with everything included. Our page on comparing several proposals sets out how to normalise them properly.

2. Leaving Ownership Undefined

This is the mistake with the longest tail, because it costs nothing until the day you want to leave, and then it costs everything.

Four things are frequently held differently from one another, and they need to be settled separately rather than covered by a single assurance:

Ask about each one specifically and get the answers in writing before signing.

3. Accepting Adjectives as Deliverables

"Ongoing optimisation." "Comprehensive content strategy." "Continuous improvement." None of these can be checked at the end of a month, which means none of them can be unmet.

The test is simple: could you, at month's end, count whether it happened? "Four pages a month" passes. "Regular content" does not. "Google Ads and Google Business Profile management" passes. "Full-funnel digital presence" does not.

Rewrite each proposal's scope as a list of countable items and send it back for confirmation. An agency that will not confirm the rewritten list is telling you something useful.

4. Starting Without a Baseline

Without a documented starting position, no subsequent claim about improvement can be verified, and the engagement becomes unauditable from day one.

The baseline needs four things, written down before any work begins: current rankings for your target terms, current call volume, current Google Business Profile position for your main searches, and current organic traffic. It takes an afternoon to produce.

Agencies that skip it are not always hiding something. But the effect is the same either way — in month six, when you ask whether this is working, nobody will be able to answer.

5. Buying Visibility While Intake Leaks

The most expensive mistake in absolute terms, and the least visible.

A firm pays for visibility, the visibility works, the calls arrive during a hearing, they go to voicemail, and the caller rings the next firm on the list. The report shows calls delivered. The firm sees no new matters. Both are true at once.

Intake coverage costs a fraction of a marketing budget and multiplies the return on all of it. It belongs before the marketing spend, not after it, and a firm that fixes intake first will get more from a smaller programme than a firm that does not gets from a larger one.

6. Signing Long on a Short Judgment

Twelve-month terms are standard in this industry and the logic offered for them is real: organic search takes time to compound, and an agency cannot invest in a six-month build against a thirty-day commitment.

The problem is the asymmetry. You are making a twelve-month commitment on the basis of a sales conversation and a proposal — essentially no evidence about how this particular agency performs on your particular account. By the time you have evidence, around month three, the decision is already made.

Shorter notice is not merely more convenient. It changes the incentive, because an agency that has to earn next month behaves differently from one that has already been paid for it. If a long term is unavoidable, negotiate a performance-based exit at month three or four.

7. Not Reading What Publishes

This one is specific to law firms and it is the only mistake on the list that carries licence exposure.

Content published under your firm's name is your responsibility under your state's advertising rules, regardless of who wrote it. Agencies producing content at volume — particularly offshore or templated content — generate exactly the phrasing those rules restrict: comparative superlatives, outcome implications, specialisation claims where your state regulates the word, testimonials without required disclaimers.

Thirty minutes a month reading pages properly before they publish is the single highest-value half hour in the engagement, and it is the one most often delegated away.

Attorney Pro Marketing's structure addresses these directly rather than rhetorically: published pricing at $2,500, $3,500 and $4,500 with no setup fee or percentage of spend, so the twelve-month total is arithmetic rather than discovery. Assets and accounts in the firm's name. Deliverables stated as page counts per tier. A day 0 baseline taken before anything is built, with the day 14 report against it. Month to month with 30 days' notice, so the term matches the evidence you have. And every page goes to you for approval before it publishes.

Call tracking with recordings from the Growth tier ($3,500) exists for the intake problem specifically — it is how a leak becomes visible instead of inferred.

Related Questions